ClaimScore has evolved into Covalynt: A full-service data science platform.
ClaimScore has evolved into Covalynt.
ClaimScore is now Covalynt.
Automated, defensible claims processing for complex litigation.

During claims processing, fraudulent and ineligible submissions dilute settlement funds and expose administrators to scrutiny. Our data intelligence platform evaluates every claim with multi-factor precision—so only legitimate class members get paid.

Book a demo
Protect legitimate class members by eliminating fraud and ineligible submissions.
Contact Us
The Litigation Challenge

High-volume claims environments invite fraud rings, synthetic identities, and coordinated submission abuse. Traditional blocking methods reject valid claimants while letting sophisticated fraud through—diluting settlement funds, reducing class member payouts, and creating defensibility risk for counsel and administrators alike.

The Covalynt Solution

Our data intelligence platform applies multi-factor scoring using proprietary data to separate legitimate class members from fraudulent submissions with scientific precision—producing consistent, evidence-based eligibility decisions that withstand scrutiny from courts, administrators, and opposing experts.

Three layers. One goal: stop fraud at the source.

The Anti-Fraud Triangle blocks fraud at the form, payment, and analysis stages—before it reaches the fund.

Explore the Anti-Fraud Triangle
A piece of the Covalynt App UI showing a dialog for a file being uploaded.
Retro Review

Bulk review claims after the claims period. Securely send claim files to ClaimScore and ClaimScore securely returns result files.

A piece of the Covalynt App UI showing a blurred generated API key and the actions and warnings around it.
Real-Time Review

ClaimScore connected directly to digital claim forms and results sent directly to claims or client management systems, in real time.

Documentation
Multi-Factor Claim Scoring

Evaluate every submission through layered evidence signals to determine eligibility and identify fraudulent activity.

Scoring System
Proprietary Data Enrichment & Evidence Integration

Incorporate our proprietary data to strengthen validation, confirm details and surface discrepancies.

Identity & Contact Validation

Verify claimant identity and contact information to confirm legitimacy and ensure accurate attribution.

Duplicate & Cluster Detection

Identifies multi-entry fraud patterns, name variations, and shared contact attributes designed to bypass traditional checks.

Fraud Breakdown
Behavioral & Submission Pattern Analysis

Detect automation, anomalies, and suspicious behaviors using temporal and structural based signals.

Transparent Flags & Audit Reasoning

Provide clear, case-ready explanations that document every flag, scoring input, and eligibility decision.

Accuracy Explained
Watch Video
Why should you pay for fraud detection?

Discover how ClaimScore can safeguard your funds with a practical example, ensuring the class receives their rightful share.

Learn More

Case Experience

Chevron arrow pointing to the left.
Chevron arrow pointing to the right.
Lopez v. Apple, Inc.

4:19-cv-04577-JSW

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America, Inc.

3:22-cv-04792-RS

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corp.

3:21-cv-01418

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Onadia v. City of New York, et al.

No. 0300340/2010

Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Bronx

In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation

16-cv-08637

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Kessler, et al. v. The Quaker Oats Company

7:24-cv-00526-KMK

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Hasemann, et al. v. Gerber Products Co., et al.

1:15-cv-02995-EK-RER (E.D.N.Y.)

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation, et al.

3:20-cv-03268

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Pompilio, et al. v. Boar’s Head Provisions Co. Inc.

7:24-cv-08220-PMH

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Nixon v. Grande Cosmetics, LLC

1:22-cv-06639

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Jimenez v. Artsana USA, Inc.

7:21-cv-07933-VB

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Perez v. Rash Curtis & Associates

4:16-cv-03396-YGR

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Candian Diamond Settlement

S-071269 / 139/10 CP

British Columbia Supreme Court / Ontario Superior Court of Justice

O’Malley, et al. v. FloSports, Inc.,

3:22-cv-04920JSC

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Rosenfeld et al. v AC2T, Inc.

506882/2023

New York Supreme Court for Kings County

Wyland v. Woopla

2023-CI-00356

Kentucky Circuit Court for Henderson County

Whiting v. Yellow Social Interactive Ltd.

2023-CI-00358

Kentucky Circuit Court for Henderson County

Gunaratna v. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare, LLC

1:23-CV-01967-ER

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Haylee Woodard v. Lilly Lashes, LLC

22STCV18692

Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County

See the depth of our work

Secure your settlement with evidence-based claim validation.

Learn More